Athe provision of transport services in this way but methods must be found for Uber to be a payer of fees and taxes. Duties and taxes can even be paid online but whichever way they are collected the very need to collect this tax revenue is a challenge. In this sense the opinion of the vicepresident of the European Commission Andrus Ansip should be noted who stated in April this year that It is not a solution to ban a service but rather to find methods of collecting taxes from this activity.
Were talking about a challenge how fees and taxes can be collected for Ubertype services. Against the Country Email List background of a situation similar to the one in Romania the court in Barcelona sent several preliminary questions to the CJEU one of which is of particular interest to us case C In d from Directive EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of December on services within the internal market excludes from its scope transport activities the activity carried out by the defendant of a profitable nature consisting of mediating between the owner the vehicle and the person who has to move in the.
City through the management of the computer environments the interface and the software application smartphones and technological platform according to the defendants expression which allow these people to come into contact must be considered a simple activity of transport or an electronic intermediary service or a service specific to the information society as defined in Article paragraph of Directive EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of June relating to the procedure for providing information in the field of standards technical regulations and norms regarding information society services This case sent by the Spanish court is still before the CJEU and mainly concerns.
發表於 13:37:07
